Skip Navigation

  • Skip to the content
  • Skip to the footer
Michigan State University masthead graphic Michigan State University masthead graphic
The Engaged Scholar Home Page

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Magazine
    Current Issue Archived Volumes
  • E-Newsletter
    Current Issue Archived Volumes Announcements and Events
  • Speaker Series
  • About

2015 | Volume 10

  • Subscribe to our publications
  • Add the RSS feed
  • Share this on Facebook
  • Share this on LinkedIn
  • Share this on Mastodon
  • Share this on Twitter
  • Share this on Bluesky

Developing Infrastructure to Support Faculty Engagement: RP&T

In reports published nationally in the late 1990s, reappointment, promotion, and tenure (RP&T) policies were cited as a major barrier to faculty involvement in outreach and engagement activities.

Following a recommendation of the 1993 Provost's Report on University Outreach, a faculty committee supported by UOE led efforts to revise the faculty review guidelines and forms with the goal of integrating engagement activities into the qualifications for RP&T. The revisions, which were implemented in 2001, allowed faculty to report their outreach and engagement throughout the form rather than in a separate section.

Implicit in this change was the assumption that outreach and engagement are part of how many scholars conduct their research, their teaching, and their service—and they should be able to characterize this work as such when seeking reappointment, promotion, or tenure. The new forms also emphasized the use of multiple ways to document quality, and distinguished service to the broader community from service to scholarly and professional organizations or to the University.

Six years later, UOE researchers conducted a study to determine how and to what extent faculty were reporting their engagement work on the revised forms, what types of activities were being reported, and whether demographic variables made a difference in reporting. Document analysis of 244 forms focused on faculty members who successfully underwent RP&T review between 2001 and 2006.

The study found that most faculty members (90%) reported at least one outreach/engagement activity on their RP&T form. Noncredit instruction was the most common activity (70%), closely followed by public events (69%) and technical assistance or expert testimony (56%). The researchers' findings have also informed the development of a useful typology of publicly engaged scholarship and observations about disciplinary variations in faculty members' approaches to community-engaged scholarship.

In addition to journal articles and presentations on this study, UOE researchers produced institution and college-level reports for each college and a discussion guide for departments and colleges about RP&T and engaged scholarship. More information about the study, as well as a summary of the revisions made, is available at: ncsue.msu.edu/research/reappointment.aspx.

  • Written by Linda Chapel Jackson, University Outreach and Engagement

Building Engagement into the Core Academic Mission of the University: The MSU Approach

  • Walking the Talk
  • Innovating, Experimenting, and Risk Taking
  • Convening and Supporting Campus-Based Networks
  • Developing Infrastructure to Support Faculty Engagement: RP&T
  • Conducting Institutional Research on Outreach
  • Telling MSU's Engagement Story
  • Recognizing Exemplary Engaged Scholarship
  • National Leadership in Discourse about the Scholarship of Engagement

Like this Magazine?
Join our mailing list

A publication of University Outreach and Engagement

Footer and Contact Information

Michigan State University Wordmark Michigan State University Print Wordmark
  • Call us: (517) 353-8977
  • Contact Information
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Accessibility
  • Call MSU: (517) 355-1855
  • Visit: msu.edu
  • Notice of Nondiscrimination
  • Spartans Will.
  • © Michigan State University