Outreach and Engagement at Michigan State University, 2008

Sponsored by MSU's National Collaborative for the Study of University Engagement (NCSUE)External link - opens in new window, the Outreach and Engagement Measurement Instrument (OEMI) gathers data about the outreach activities of MSU faculty and academic staff. The information is self-reported and participation in the annual survey is voluntary. Data for 2008 was collected between January and March 2009 and represents the fifth year of data collection; 1101 faculty and academic staff responded to the survey. Since 2004, 2,539 distinct (non-duplicative) respondents have reported their outreach and engagement through the OEMI. For this snapshot, OEMI data is augmented with data from the service-learning and civic engagement student registration system.

OEMI results for 2008* include the following:

$19,637,429.71

Value of salary investment by MSU faculty and academic staff in addressing issues of public concern (data from those reporting outreach activities on the OEMI)

98.1%

Respondents whose outreach contributed to achieving Boldness by Design (BBD) imperatives:

78.2% = Enhanced the student experience

75.4% = Enriched community, economic, and family life

47.5% = Expanded international reach

68.6% = Increased research opportunities

57.0% = Strengthened stewardship

1,151

Number of specific projects/activities reported

Of the respondents who described specific projects/activities:

49.3% = Reported working with external partners

44.7% = Reported having created intellectual property and scholarly outcomes

36.1% = Reported that their outreach work impacted their scholarly or teaching practices

CHART:  Forms of Engagement reported by MSU Faculty and Academic Staff in 2008
CHART:  Forms of Outreach Cross-Tabulated with Societal Concerns for 2008
CHART:  Number of Student Applications for Service-Learning Received and Accommodated, 2002-2009

* The number of "responses" is greater than the number of "respondents." Respondents were given the opportunity to describe their engagement activities for up to two areas of social concern; each description was counted as a separate response.

Like this Magazine? Join our mailing list